Evidential Material

Previous Page    [Site Home Page]

ONE INCIDENT could relate to a threat to MANY RIGHTS in the Bill of Rights

Examples of Evidence that a Commissioner will examine:

Material

What's important
[ONE Incident]

How is it Important

How are Rights threatened
[MANY RIGHTS]

Court Files

 A Commissioner can examine evidence on any file in order to identify a pattern of misconduct for a particular Lawyer and where this conduct is a threat to a Right in the Bill of Rights.
Court files contain evidential material for a particular matter.
All court files are secure and archived (except when used as a lure by Dirty Tricks Lawyers).
A commissioner can retrieve all the files for say a particular Lawyer in order to examine and detect a pattern of conduct.  		 Evidential Material from "expert" testimony Testimony from a particular "expert" that is unreasonable and procedurally unfair. [S 33 Just Administrative Action] Action that is lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair.
Fabricated evidence. Vital evidence such as evidence on affidavit that may have been fabricated. [S 33 Just Administrative Action]  Action that is lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair.
Judgment by Fraud Evidence on file that has been fabricated in a corrupt manner by the intervention from a Particular Lawyer in order to shift the focus to fresh allegations and thereby creating circumstances to allow a "judgment by fraud’. S 33 Just Administrative Action] Action that is lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair.

S 165 JUD - Judicial Authority - Interfering in the functioning of the courts.
Ignored evidential material. Factual evidence even of a Scientific nature that has never been challenged but which could have contributed significantly when applying the law to which the evidence applies. [S35 Right to adduce and challenge evidence]
Irregular Warrants of Execution. Warrants issued by a Registrar (on instruction from a Particular Lawyer) in an irregular manner to execute an action for which there is no specific Order or Judgment and which threatens a right in the Bill of Rights. [S9 Equality] Right to equal protection and benefit of the law.

[S 33 Just Administrative Action] Action that is lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair.

 

Transcripts.

  A Commissioner has the power to transcribe any case to determine if the Bill of Rights is being enforced by the courts.
Transcripts: Everything that is said in any court is recorded and can be printed out in the exact order of how the proceedings transpired.
These transcripts (printouts of court proceedings) are vital for any appeal court when evaluating an appeal. 

A commissioner can evaluate proceedings of, for instance, where the public has rested it's faith in the outcome of a matter to be concluded in a predictable range of outcomes, only to be informed after the court appearance of an unexpected outcome that does not fall within the range of what is expected.

 Witness choice of words. Witness suborned to testify in a particular way by a Dirty Tricks Lawyer and which testimony contributes directly to the outcome. [S 33 Just Administrative Action] Action that is lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair.
Irregular proceedings. Where courts refuses evidence to be challenged. that could have contributed to a different outcome. [S35 Litigation Rights] right to challenge evidence.
A commissioner can investigate to determine if the Bill of Rights has been interpreted to consider International Law during the course of proceedings. [S39 Interpretation] right to consider International Law.
A commissioner can re-visit the evidence to determine if a matter was determined on the original set of issues or was determined on issues not placed before the court at any time.  [S 33 Just Administrative Action] Action that is lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair 

Judgements

 A Commissioner has the power to evaluate judgments in order to determine if the public are protected by the Bill of Rights being properly enforced in the courts.
  Incongruous Judgments. Judgments that make no reference to the set of issues that were initially before the court. [S 34 Just Administrative Action]
[S 35 LIT Right to appeal]

Orders

 A Commissioner can examine Court orders in order to determine if the Bill of Rights is being enforced by the courts - especially w.r.t. S33 - Just Administrative Action.
  Applications founded on the Bill of Rights. Where applications to any court are founded on points of law or conduct that threatens the Bill of Rights - and the applications are dismissed in a punitive manner. [S165 Judicial Authority] - Courts must apply the Constitution & the Law.

 

 Incongruous Orders. The public have a right to know that some (most) Court Orders are prepared before a hearing in "draft" format.
In this instance the public have a right to know the content in advance - to eliminate any surprises for which the consequences (next step) are insurmountable and costly.		 [S 33 Just Administrative Action]
[S34 Access to courts] -
       
    A commissioner can evaluate the execute ability of orders - for instance - where an order favouring one party is executable - the other part, either not executable or no provisions in place to benefit the other party..  [S 39 Equal Protection & benefit of the law] 
[S 33 Just Administrative Action] 

Lawyer Costs

 A Commissioner can examine the pattern of litigation of a particular lawyer - especially in cases where the public are locked into protracted litigation spanning several years - to determine deliberate provocation of the situation due to Lawyer Misconduct & the resultant costs which could have been avoided.
  Over Billing. Protracted Litigation - where lawyers use their profession to lock the public into protracted litigation spanning 5 to 10 years. [S 33 Just Administrative Action] 
  Malicious Litigation - A commissioner can investigate the litigation history in order to detect a pattern of conduct to achieve an end by any means.
Double Billing. Dividing Litigation - Where Lawyers conduct litigation with a modus operandi to divide and weaken a client, an opponent, or both. 
And then to bill both the (divided) client & the opponent.

A commissioner can investigate circumstances where lawyers claim fees from both the client and a legally stranded opponent.
  Using "Costs Orders" to seize immovable property or essential possessions. Where court orders are prepared before the outcome of a hearing is determined - and the costs order (legal fees) is awarded to one party.  [S 33 Just Administrative Action] 
A commissioner can determine if any reasoning behind a cost (fees) order is congruent with the proceedings.  [S35 Fair trial] -
[S 33 Just Administrative Action]
A commissioner can investigate the manner in which costs (legal fees) are determined -
and if these orders result in a threat to the public's property being seized in an unconstitutional process.		 [S 33 Just Administrative Action] 

Officers of the Court are expected to respect the Constitution and the Law

For Examples of Lawyer Misconduct that is a Threat to the Bill of Rights : SEE HERE


Previous Page